As the laws change around the world and further restrict what porn people can buy and sell, it becomes increasingly clear that I have been right all along. The world is starting to realize that some “fetishes” are actually crime fantasies, and the world is starting to take action. The latest kind of content being targeted is incest and child impersonation, but I’d like to take it a step further and ban even more porn. I’ve long said that incest, child impersonation and bestiality are shameful, backed by the fact that these activities have already been deemed inappropriate by many cultures throughout human history. Today I’m going to get ahead of the governments of the world and explain why these, and other perverted genres, are no longer acceptable.
I don’t buy the line that we all have to stick together and protect criminal deviants’ ability to sell crime fantasy content, or else we’ll all be banned(as Xbiz writers have claimed). We’ve already been sticking up for these degenerates and that is exactly where we are – ID laws for customers and banned words for producers, and things are only getting more strict. It’s time we stand up for what is correct and gate-keep so that we can protect our industry ourselves while we still have one.
Let me be clear – No, it isn’t OK to dress and act like a little girl to seduce grown men. No, you can’t have sex with a plastic dog. No, you can’t pretend you’re a baby in a crib because it makes you horny. This stuff is what freaks out normal people, and with the internet being what it is, these exact scenarios are lurking just around the corner. The degenerates have had their day. Now it’s time for Lady Ashley to ban porn. To truly understand what these clip-creators hope is subtle, the rock must be lifted to reveal the creepy truth that crawls beneath. Let’s dive into the details of each of these sick mental afflictions and get on the ban-wagon. You won’t be doing anyone any favors by continuing to pretend these “fetishes” are OK.
Warning: the following subject matter may be uncomfortable for some readers, but no more uncomfortable than the fact that all of these examples are sitting on the internet, waiting to spread sickness. I didn’t invent any of this, I’m just the one brave enough to point it out and say enough is enough.
Lady Ashley bans Child Impersonation
You’ve seen it. Often it comes from young women who are still maturing. They cling to powder pink and stuffed animals while exploring their sexual nature. It’s a little confusing, as much of puberty is, but it’s innocent enough and nothing outright shameful. The fact is, they are coming of age and this is all a normal part of the process. However, at some point there is a time in every woman’s life when she has to put away the pigtails and plaid schoolgirl skirts and start acting her age. Yet some women see profit, and instead of maturing throughout their 20s, the persona they built regresses to infancy as they grow into their 40s. What these middle-aged women do sexualizes young girls. Just let it sink in for a second how sick that is.
You see “FemDommes” speaking on female supremacy while wearing frilly, doily dresses – the kind that moms put on their new babies. They’re signaling to men to start looking at toddlers in a new, disgusting light. You see brats dressing up in Girl Scout uniforms, with the premise of selling cookies door-to-door to strangers. They’re telling men it’s OK to sexualize a young child who just showed up at his house – that’s downright dangerous. You see bimbos teasing in plaid skirts while standing in a green screen high school hallway – again, inspiring men to park outside of the local school and watch girls on their way home. Women are doing this to other women. And they’re doing it for money.
Lady Ashley bans Incest
No, it isn’t consenting adults. More times than not, incest involves children. If it happens to be adult relatives having sexual relations, it likely started when one or both were kids. Some of the most popular incest scenarios are reenactments of the nightmares many children live through on a daily basis. There’s the overbearing “mommy domme” who catches her son masturbating, so she tells him to stop and let her take care of it. Ask yourself when would a mother even be shocked her son is masturbating? Probably in the early days of puberty when she still expects him to be her little boy. The character of daddy’s little girl giggling in pigtails is helping some disgusting pig to pretend he’s having sex with his daughter. As if grown man having a sexual encounter with a young female isn’t sick enough, the twist of making the female his adolescent child adds a patriarchal element to the rape crime fantasy. Even scenarios with siblings or kissing cousins would have likely started when they were kids, too close in age and sheltered too closely together without enough outside influences. The sad truth is that there are a lot of people in sex work who were victims of child sex abuse, so it’s an actual mind fuck that they would make content that perpetuates the idea that it’s acceptable to abuse a child in the home. Again, none of this is a replacement for therapy. Something seriously traumatic likely happened to these people when they were children, and it shouldn’t be exploited for $10.
Lady Ashley bans Adult Baby Diaper Lovers (ABDL)
Obviously this is some sort of a disgusting psycho-sexual hang-up. Something clearly went wrong early in a person’s life if they get erotic gratification from sitting in a wet diaper and sucking on a pacifier. Whether it was a neglectful parent and a child soothing itself, or sexual abuse of a baby, this is not a fetish. Some sick person making $10 from a video encouraging the viewer to piss in a diaper is not justification to exploit this mental illness, nor is it a replacement for therapy. There is no getting around it – when someone is pretending to be a baby involved in sexual scenarios, the fantasy is that a baby is being raped. Who the hell would think that’s OK? No normal person, that’s for sure. Why does that have to be in a video and sold to others? It absolutely doesn’t.
Lady Ashley bans Furries
Let’s be real, it’s bestiality. Put a fox-tail butt plug in, a kitty-cat headband on, or sketch humanoid animal hunks. It’s all the same – imagining sex with an animal. I shouldn’t need to express how this is wrong, but as furry is a growing fetish online, it seems that someone must. Animals are innocent creatures. They can’t make the same decisions as humans and they can’t understand things the same way. We humans have the tools and brains to overpower any animal and always have the advantage. Any sexual interaction between a human and an animal is inherently rape because animals can’t consent. Furthermore, our anatomy is not compatible and nothing fruitful can come from sexual relations.
But what if someone just wants to pretend to be an animal for sex? There’s not much difference between a donkey show (where a woman rapes a burro) and the scene from The Shining (with the animal-mask guy down the hallway partaking in oral sex). The whole idea with a fetish is that it’s what is needed for someone to achieve satisfaction, and if someone needs an animal involved to climax, they need their head examined. Even when someone draws a throbbing dong and giant tits on a tiger-person hybrid, they’re sexualizing an animal. They are telling the world they think tigers are attractive and they would like to have sex with one. Otherwise they’d just draw an erotic hermaphrodite deity and call it a day. The sad truth is these infantile individuals are desperate to escape their hard reality and they’ve conflated natural sexual desires with their child-like surroundings. They’re lashing out on the world with their mental illness, trying to normalize raping animals, and that must be stopped.
Lady Ashley bans Male Doms
To be frank, it’s wrong. There’s nothing kinky about it because it’s the natural order of things. The male of the species is built to overpower the female for mating. A man isn’t proving anything when he dominates a woman – other than he’s weak, insecure and pathetic. The only way for a man to dominate a woman in the modern world is to manipulate and abuse her. He’ll brainwash her into thinking being called a “slut” is a term of endearment. He’ll choke her with his dick until she tears up and tell her that’s the only time she’s really beautiful. He’ll make her call him “daddy” to emphasize his patriarchal authority over her. What is sexy about any of this? That a woman is being abused? You can never ask a woman in these scenarios if she’s consenting because she’s already been brainwashed into accepting her place. Keep in mind, women are afraid to even ask for a raise at work, so when the man in her life says “do xyz” and she’s been conditioned to listen, she absolutely will without thinking. It’s going to take real therapy to build back her self-worth to the point that she can leave the abusive relationship. Why are we romanticizing this in porn and giving men the green light to harm their partners?
Lady Ashley wraps it up
Now you might be asking yourself, ‘But Lady Ashley, what about the play dommes who drool on their chins and tits and lick the bottom of their shoes?’ Well, there’s no need to ban them. They certainly are bimbos and phonies, but if they want to degrade themselves in such a manner, I’ll allow it. As long as they’re being an adult human while they do it, they’re only proving that they’re actual losers, just like their customers.
It’s been said that hardcore pornography is something you know when you see it. Well, so is any sexual imagery that crosses the line. Some things your favorite creators are doing might fly under the radar for now, but it shouldn’t be a surprise that they are guilty of catering to criminal fantasies. It’s not a sexy and fun world when governments are coming after us. For too long, the idea in the sex work scene is “we have to protect everyone or they’ll come for anyone”. Now we’re seeing that didn’t work because they’re starting to come for us all. The deplorable actions of some are drawing too much attention and scrutiny from the fuddy-duddies who write laws.
We producers and consumers should have been calling out problematic porn much earlier, but that doesn’t mean it’s too late to do something about it. We can start policing ourselves now and stop cancelling those who are critical and protective of the industry. Ostracize these bad actors into changing or leaving the scene. Let’s eradicate all of the problematic porn in one go. It’s really simple to suss out what’s wrong from what’s right. Hint: there are probably already laws against it in your region.
